One of my life’s great frustrations is the number of good ideas that get lost throughout the course of a normal day. Before I can find a voice recorder, pencil, or something to write my ideas on, they fly away and my train of thought is lost forever. It’s not an unfamiliar tune – authors, artists, musicians – all of them frequently relate stories of how much goes through their minds that is simply lost before they get the chance to write it down or record it. Such is life for anyone any kind of a creative bent – be it an innovative scientist, a performer, or even a part-time blog writer who likes to ramble about life’s daily struggles.
My own difficulties with the passive annihilation of good ides got me thinking about how good ideas can be actively squelched as well. People who are asked to “be professional”, not make a “Career limiting move” by speaking their minds, or who are asked to just live with a problem or not step on someone’s toes – all of these sometimes innocuous messages serve to do one thing – actively decrease the number of ideas that get poured out.
When I do get to writing down or recording my thoughts, I also often find that a lot of those really don’t have any legs and never go anywhere. So, too, the number of ideas you get might result in only a few gems – but therein lies a certain discovery that needs to take place. That is, that you can’t demand good ideas. You have to sift through all the ideas to find the really good ones – because generating good ideas comes about only through the process of crafting them. Also, the value of an idea is not something that is inherent and internal to the idea itself. Rather, it is a function of time, place and circumstances that make any idea valuable. What seems like a really, really good thought and the solution to all our problems today might be utterly ridiculous tomorrow. Nonetheless, that value judgment can’t take place as the idea is being formulated in someone’s head. It has to come about and be judged under the lights of the here and now.
This is something of a paradox, I suppose – that in order to attain high levels of ingenuity in products and activities, the environment in which those ideas are created must support an endless ocean of thoughts that yield very little value, in the hopes that, eventually, a single very good one will be produced. Generating ideas is an inefficient process, even if those ideas are generated around improving efficiency.
Therefore, the efficiency of thought should never be pursued. Only the efficiency of implementation.